Hiking the Peak - Telluride

Everyone knows where to find Mike Price after a day of work. Oak is only a door and a half down from his shop and the bartender pours us beers before we even walk in. It would be a problem if it wasn’t the place where you not only found him but his boss, often co-workers, and truly the rest of the town. Or the people in town you want to be around anyway. I’m telling you all this because it was one Tuesday night at the Oak where we happened to decide to do a Peak mission the very next day. Beers and the realization the mountain will close soon got us motivated to get after it that night and I’m sure glad we did!

The Peak that I am referring to is of course Palmyra Peak the tallest point at the ski area and one of the tallest places you can ski in bounds just about anywhere I suspect. It’s taller then 1310 at Loveland and for sure gets you higher then that silly lift people talk about at Breckenridge. Google informs me that the top is 13,319 ft and I can say after hiking from Chair 12 to the top it sure feels like 13,000 ft and the exposure you feel at the top is no joke either. To make it worse they give you a small snow pack platform to balance on at the top, not usually a problem unless you are sharing it with 3 other people…

I’m not really sure how far the hike is or how many feet we had to climb but all in all it could have been much worse than it was. It took us just about an hour to get up and in all reality the hike was scarier than the ski. It’s always funny to make jokes about falling into Ophir or Alta Lakes from the resort when you are doing the short hike-tos bellow the peak but when you are on a boot pack on top of skree in hard ski boots that possibility seems much more likely. There’s at least two places that got me a little spooked between the steep narrow shoot below and the chawsy wind swept boulder you had to scramble. And really once you pass through the gate the whole hike is a no fall zone, you probably won’t die but you might be wishing you had looked at the map longer.

Once at the top and you concur the last nearly vertical boot pack, you are welcomed by a bright orange toboggan (that some poor soul undoubtedly had to hike up there) and a bamboo rope line to remind you that you are still in the boundary of the ski area. It’s an important reminder given the terrain you are about to ski. It’s no baby hike-to-ski or palma lift to above treeline, it is just what you should expect when you look at the tallest mountain out the window of the Gondola. A variable, windy, and steep 13,000 ft peak that for some reason you are allowed to ski down just like any other run on the mountain. And that’s just what we did. We clipped into our bindings, pointed our tips downhill and went for it. I wish I could say we got a fresh powder line down the couloir but it was chopped, old north facing snow that was just interesting enough to get your heart to pump when your skis did something a little different then you wanted them to. But from there you can drop 4,500ft down to town have another beer at Oak and keep skiing if you wanted to.

For me I headed back down to town and retreated into the library to get at least a half day of work done. I’m sure going to miss the ability to walk out the door, hike up a mountain, ski with good friends and then just pretend it’s another day at the office. This may be a post for another time but being able to experience all of this in the context of what I do (for those who don’t know I spend most my days supporting the Industrial Efficiency and Decarbonization Office at the US Department of Energy) makes everything just work.

On the far left side of the image if you look close there is a zig zag skin track and people hiking up from the uppers and into Ophir (my guess at least).

Leadville Colorado

The last couple years I’ve had trouble finding myself a project, one of those projects worth putting a couple years of image making toward. My lingering dream is still a project focused on Idaho salmon, conservation, history of the sawtooths, blah blah. But last winter, and this last spring, has gotten me interested in Leadville Colorado. Leadville is one of those places most people have heard of but maybe never seen. For me it’s been a new place to explore, streets to wander through, and witness the eclectic aesthetic of a high altitude mountain town.

For this project I definitely want to focus on shooting film to hone in my workflow and discover what I need to do to get the look that I’m going for. The two images above are nearly exactly what I’m looking for in terms of warmth and tones. What I am really hoping for is getting into some DSLR scanning and really trying to pump out as much as I can without the Hasselblad X1. The biggest challenge for this project is that I want to do everything in the process, other than developing C-41 film, and I know this will take some decent trial and error. The final deliverable, I hope is a series of zines or postcards that can be sold in town.

Let's Talk Slide Film and Scanning (Epson v550 v.s Flextight X1)

So a while back when I first gained access to the Hasselblad Flextight X1 I wrote a review about the enhanced image quality over my Epson flatbed scanner. Well now that my time with the X1 is coming to an end (for now) and I’ve been able to use it a bit more I want to comment on it again. Mostly in the context of color slide film and why I’m a bit worried about the 5 rolls of Provia 100f in the freezer now that I may be losing access to the X1. As always the best way to show you what I mean is to share some images scanned on both machines, I’ll make sure to share the film type as well so you can get a better idea of how everything comes out.

For the sliders below the “before” image is the Flextight X1 scan and the “after” image is the Epson v550 scan. For me there is a clear winner.

Both images seen above were shot this summer on my Pentax 67 and the Takumar 105mm F2.4 lens on expired Fuji Velvia 50 film. This film is known as some of the finest grained film on the market and has high color saturation. The reason why I picked 120 film for this comparison is that both scanners are actually scanning at the same resolution (3200 dpi) which should highlight differences unrelated to resolution alone. This is by no means a scientific experiment but purely a usability one, put the film in and try to get the most I can get out with what I know.

For me the X1 scan is absolutely wonderful with definite higher sharpness and much better color rendition (even though it’s 32 not 48 bit color). I also want to point out, like in the other review, the dynamic range is also leaps and bounds better. If you look in the sky for the gas station image or the slightly soft telephone pole (RIP depth of field on a 6x7 negative, this was even shot at F11) above you’ll see the brights falling off in the Epson scan. The most important difference for me however is the sharpness. Remember that the resolution is exactly the same so the sharpness comes down completely to the mechanics of the two machines. This is where you see the true difference between a flatbed and the “virtual drum scan” not only does the X1 have auto focus but it also flexes the film so the plane of focus stays constant throughout the scan This is huge and why I’m desperately trying to figure out how to purchase or find a space to use one of these in the future.

Just for fun I think I will compare a 35mm frame shot through the Nikon FM with the 50mm F1.8 Ais lense on Provia 100f. This was the format I used in the first blog comparison so if you are interested in seeing more examples then the one below click this link. Again the “before” image is from the Flextight X1 and the “after” image is the Epson V550.

It’s again easy to see a striking difference between the two images and why I can say that I really don’t like slide film that’s not scanned with the X1. Not only is the Epson scan much less sharp but the colors where off from the real life images, both what I envisioned in my head and what you’d see on a light table. The final thing I can say is the X1 has way more information meaning the files are way more editable then the one that come from the Epson. Now, people can argue all they want about not editing film photos but even if I did everything with a dark room process I’d be dodging/burning, changing contrasts, and tweaking the colors there too. So these people can use their lightroom presets and Iphones and get angry at someone else. Anyways the X1 just gives me a more information to create accurate adjustments.

The final comparison I want to make is with cheap color negative 35mm film, specifically a frame shot on Fujifilm C200. Again everything is the same (X1 before and Epson After) but the differences are much less apparent. Another important note is both .tif files from both machines were scanned as positives then converted using Negative Lab Pro. This again decreases the number of variables making the raw scan responsible for most of the difference in the image. I will most likely make a post about Negative Lab Pro and why I think it is necessary if you are scanning lots of color film in the near future because it really changes the game!

While the difference in color negative film may seem just as drastic as before I’d argue the results are much closer even though the resolution on the X1 file is twice as high. Here the sharpness is much more similar and this is because the grain size must be large enough for both machines to pick up well enough (also must have lucked out with the film being flat on the Epson). The blue of the skys is also different between the files, though this is a simple correction. What I like about this comparison, at least for cheap 35mm film, I have a workflow that creates images and quality that I’m happy with using the Epson Scanner which is faster and available to me. Using finer grain professional film may widen the gap between the machines but for now I think I’m really happy with my color negative results. I’ll hopefully be getting some 35mm Portra back soon!

The biggest thing that I have realized after getting these rolls back and continuing to test and play is that the way film is digitized dictates the look, feel, and quality of the final image. While I have not had success with positive film in the Epson I have locked down color negative. All this means I’ll need to keep playing around and exploring, which is the fun thing with film. I think this year I will try DSLR scanning my film, personally this is the weirdest way to go about it as the point of shooting film is to shoot film not digital. That being said the sensor in the X1 is the same CCD used in the older Hasselblad medium format backs, so while it’s weird I’ve seen great results.

Film or Digital

So it just so happened that when I was in Colorado this last winter I was shooting both film and digital. This is not something I usually do because a picture is a picture, but it just seemed to make sense at the time. I’m somewhat glad that I did though because I’ve never really been able to compare the results head to head. Additionally, this is something I’ve been thinking about recently because I’ve found myself reaching for my film camera more than ever and sometimes I wonder why I’ve quit investing in my digital gear. Do I just not care for the convenience and editability of digital images or is it the image quality of a digital sensor? I’m not sure, but the purpose of this blog is to see how the results compare and if anything interesting comes of my little experiment .

I may have overstepped when I said head to head because while these images look similar the are all shot at different focal lengths and on different digital cameras. Check the captions provided for the specifics of each shot just so you have an idea. All of the film shots were taken on the Nikon FM and the Nikkor 50mm Ais lens while the digital is a mix of Canon 7D Mark II and Fujifilm X100s. Also for the digital photos I had no film images for reference so they were edited to my usual style for digital: warm highs and lows, muted black point, and desaturated blues with nice saturation. The film on the other had was shot at least 1 stop overexposed and scanned using a v550 with Negative Lab Pro for conversion and edited to my film style: very warm, light, airy with pastel colors.

Stickers at Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Nikon FM 50mm F1.8 AIS, Fujicolor C200, V550, Negative Lab Pro.

Stickers at Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Nikon FM 50mm F1.8 AIS, Fujicolor C200, V550, Negative Lab Pro.

Stickers at Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Fujifilm X100s.

Stickers at Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Fujifilm X100s.

All of these images were taken at the summit or near the summit of Loveland Pass in Colorado. The pass gets up to 12,000ft which is pretty amazing as this is well above the treeline! From here you have views as far as Copper Mountain and be able to inspect the front side of Arapahoe Basin. I’d also say that if you are a fan of orange gold alpine-glow watching the sunset here will be something to remember. For me it’s a reminder of rugged places, adventure in the mountains, and an easy hike to feel the burn of high altitude.

Top of Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Nikon FM 50mm F1.8 AIS, Fujicolor C200, V550, Negative Lab Pro.

Top of Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Nikon FM 50mm F1.8 AIS, Fujicolor C200, V550, Negative Lab Pro.

Top of Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Canon 7D Mark II, 70-200mm F2.8 USM L. Shot at about 135mm I think

Top of Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Canon 7D Mark II, 70-200mm F2.8 USM L. Shot at about 135mm I think.

Arapahoe Basin from Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Nikon FM 50mm F1.8 AIS, Fujicolor C200, V550, Negative Lab Pro.

Arapahoe Basin from Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Nikon FM 50mm F1.8 AIS, Fujicolor C200, V550, Negative Lab Pro.

Arapahoe Basin from Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Canon 7D Mark II, Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 Art

Arapahoe Basin from Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Canon 7D Mark II, Sigma 18-35mm F1.8 Art

So what do you all think? For me I’m somewhat blown away and I think I’m going to have to do more of this just to see how the two mediums react in different situations. Right off the bat what I notice is the soft warm highlights that come through with the film. Admittedly the dusk/sunset time of day comes through much better in the digital and it feels more like how it was in real life. The luminance and colors are far more true to the scene when looking at the digital images. That being said, I like the film images better. I love the soft highlights that bleed into the shadows and the subtle colorcast of magenta. The softening of the images and oranges are also really pleasing to me. The film images aren’t what the scene actually looked like but it is how I’d want to remember the scenes. They feel more like an artistic version of the digital image, something I wouldn’t have created while editing without seeing the results from the film.

I must say that I was surprised I enjoyed the film better. In 20 years, who knows how things may change however. Will the time and effort of developing and scanning the film ware off? Will the faded pastel look (aka the nostalgic look) still be cool? Who’s to say? But being the stubborn person I am and knowing that I will always own and enjoy digital cameras I had to try and make my digital look like film. Below is what I came up with using the Fuji X100s file and about 20 minutes of editing, with more time and know how I’m sure I could get them to match. So if I could simply recreate the results of film in digital then why even shoot film?

Stickers at Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Nikon FM 50mm F1.8 AIS, Fujicolor C200, V550, Negative Lab Pro.

Stickers at Loveland Pass, Summit County CO 2021. Nikon FM 50mm F1.8 AIS, Fujicolor C200, V550, Negative Lab Pro.

Picture from my Fuji X100s edited to look like film.

Picture from my Fuji X100s edited to look like film.

For the sake of brevity and to prevent me from ranting more than I already have I’m going to simply say, shoot whatever inspires you to shoot. Recently shooting my film cameras has been what gets me outside to make images more then digital. But, I also know the first camera I’m going to pick up if going outside on an adventure will be my digital gear. So shoot whatever camera that’s in your hands and if that’s 7 cameras then, well, good luck and don’t complain later.